I just finished reading The Hours by Michael Cunningham. It's a tricky beast to pin down and I still don't know what I think about it. For once, I loved, truely loved "Stream-of-Consciousness" writing in a commercial literary offering...usually novel-length SOC enterprises bring me to tears of boredom or embarassment for the author.
The characters lived vividly on the page...moreso than most books and stories I've read recently. While somewhat simplistic, the metaphors drawn throughout the work are spare and affecting; Cunningham uses just enough imagery to make the epiphanies believable, a quality most easily identified by the fact I missed one or two in my zealousness to read quickly.
As far as how I felt afterwards: hollow, hopeful. The book portrays humans as beings with qualities of beasts and robots, afflicted with a soul that doesn't come with explanations or instructions. We are special creatures, but mainly for our abilitiy to be tragic and hopeful (or to experience such feelings and thoughts and themes). While a complex and, consequently, authoritative-seeming picture of humans is painted, I have a feeling that human nature lies elsewhere. Thus, I found myself having blasphemous thoughts such as "This is a dangerous book...who will get their hands on this and not understand completely and kill themselves?...what if this book brings dispair and not hope?"--all the same lines that I despise from others.
Silly thinking aside, I'm learning to trust readers, not just of my work, but especially of others' work, especially of powerful, dynamic books such as The Hours.
